Yesterday we reported that state education officials were expected to vote on whether to approve two virtual charter schools to open next fall.
The schools would serve up to 3,000 students who would take all of their classes at home and interact with students and teachers online. Supporters have argued that it would help students who don’t thrive in traditional settings – especially those dealing with health issues, athletic schedules, or bullying.
Critics, however, contend that it would take dollars away from the already cash-strapped traditional public schools and divert it to for-profit companies that have shaky reputations in other parts of the country.
The General Assembly required last year that the state create a four-year pilot program for two virtual charter schools. Only two schools applied: North Carolina Virtual Academy, run by K12 Inc.; and Connections Academy, to be managed by Connections Education.
WUNC's Reema Khrais attended the vote Thursday, and the two online charter schools were approved.
State Board of Ed about to vote on allowing online charter schools in NC. Tate wants to wait so there r more than 2 applicants #nced #ncga
— Reema Khrais (@reemakhrais) February 5, 2015
Board of Ed decides to not delay the vote, they're going to still vote on the online charter schools #nced #ncga
— Reema Khrais (@reemakhrais) February 5, 2015
Two online charter schools coming to NC. State Board of Ed approves four-year pilot program to begin in fall. #nced #ncga
— Reema Khrais (@reemakhrais) February 5, 2015
One of the online charter schools is affiliated with K12 Inc. Other is affiliated with Pearson. #nced
— Reema Khrais (@reemakhrais) February 5, 2015
Here's more of Reema Khrais' original reporting about the online charter schools:
Accountability and Access
K12 Inc, a for-profit education company, has run into trouble in other states:
- Tennessee Virtual Academy has been ordered to close next year because of poor student performance
- A virtual school in Pennsylvania severed ties with the company following complaints of lack of resources.
For months, state board of education members have been raising questions over accountability and access, arguing that they will only approve the schools if they’re qualified.
“The applicants have gone through a very thorough process,” said board member Becky Taylor. “I hope other states have taken them through the process that we have taken them through.”
At a meeting Thursday, members discussed the issue of learning coaches. The state’s contract with the virtual charter schools requires that they provide learning coaches for students who may not have a parent or responsible adult to supervise and help them stay on task.
But there was disagreement over whether the schools should “ensure” that every student has a learning coach or whether it “must provide” learning coaches for students who don’t have them.
Board member Evelyn Bulluck argued that if the nonprofit boards running the virtual public schools couldn’t provide learning coaches then they would be “excluding a segment of the population.”
“We’ve got a lot of at-risk students whose parents cannot assume this responsibility, and that’s trouble to me,” she said.
But Lieutenant Governor Dan Forest said that it would be difficult and unnecessary to require the nonprofit boards to provide a learning coach.
“Virtual charter schools are not for everybody,” he said. “I don’t know how the nonprofit could actually provide a better learning coach than a family member.”
The State Board of Education is expected to clarify that point before the vote Thursday morning.
